Intelligent Design

Intelligent Design is not a theory:

“A requirement of science is that it makes certain predictions that are tested in a laboratory.” U.S. geologist Robert Hazen, “A further requirement is that it does not rely on supernatural or miraculous process.”

The primary cases, which promotes intelligent design, that life and the universe have systems that are so complex they can only be explained by a Creator are. The essence of this theory is not completely verifiable. The only test that is rising, if we can not scientifically explain complex systems so they must have developed a form of intelligence.

When it was developed by a “creator” of an entity or person, it is God or an alien monster huge spaghetti, and then we went to test without it. The protocol for implicit test is to drop and stop the search because the answers are hard to explain to the question.

This conclusion brings me to the “growing problem” that intelligent design is just a symptom.

Why not continue this theory on public education push is irresponsible:

Although these attitudes and responses will not be acceptable they are to draw attention to the important issues in public education.
The problems that we in our schools is the decline in the quality of education our children receive today. The whole history of our Read the rest of this entry »

This is the general idea that all children should be educated properly and must be done to understand the situation. This will help them to behave properly. But in reality, every adult has to learn a lot from children. Every child has the behavior built into them lessons. If you learn to learn their behavior and in turn lead to proper lessons of life, they will thrive in very important people in society. Psychologists believe that we must prepare our children to face the world. You should definitely different moods and understand how people react in different moods.

In fact, the children are taught in parallel to the house and also the society in which they live. Although the importance of higher education can not be questioned, is education that is offered by life itself and of other people, much larger than the academic training they receive. What is learned in life, and the other can never be forgotten. But unfortunately it seems to be a gap between what is taught in schools and universities and what is learned outside of these institutions. With the power of “external Read the rest of this entry »

The proliferation of methods to deliver our ideas and more on the way, has been the First Amendment and are interpreted and reinterpreted, to provide protection against the freedom of speech exercised by others. Many of us grew up hearing or saying: “Sticks and Stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me.” Today we begin to respond to the fallacy of this mockery of our courts and look to take measures to limit those things that could cause such a reaction. To express our freedom, our ideas and opinions that may be the risk in the future, as we in the 21st Century research and amidst threats of ethnic equality and cultural input.

Our founding fathers wrote a modification first optimistic of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which reads: “Congress shall make no law, an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise, or the freedom of speech or the press or the right of people to peaceful assembly and the government for a complaint “(United States Bill of Rights) restitution petition. Although the apparent intent was to protect the liberties of the people from the tyranny of big government, it is clear that the makers wisely wants to leave the interpretation of these freedoms in every generation.

It should be noted that today as never before, the interpretations of these freedoms is subject to many factors such as social anxiety, equality, Homeland Security and the Government, and equity are.

Fear leads to acts of sedition in time of war, a desire for the same freedoms of speech and freedom of assembly opened in the fight for equality. Many felt some limits on the freedoms of others exceeded, Read the rest of this entry »

From 1925, a plan to challenge the existing laws, there were many challenges for the teaching of evolution in public schools. This famous court case, known as the Scopes Monkey Trial in Dayton, Tennessee, held in 1925, urged the state law prohibiting the teaching of evolution. John Scopes, a substitute teacher, at the request of the ACLU, was teaching biology from an evolutionary perspective. The ACLU had to be a test case with the subject and worked with the school district and scopes. Scopes lost the case and was sentenced to a fine, and the anti-evolution Butler Act was confirmed.

Nevertheless, it is a well accepted maxim that you can “win the battle and lose the war.” It seemed like the end result of this famous case. The case was covered extensively by the media. Continue on behalf of the state was known fundamentalist and three times the former presidential candidate, William Jennings Bryan. In defense of the liberal defenders of good Scopes, Clarence Darrow was known. Although Darrow lost the case, in the opinion of most Americans, emerged looking rather foolish and fanatical fundamentalists. Time has passed. Finally, science has prevailed, and prevailed in the development of public school biology classes.
Read the rest of this entry »

From 1925, a plan to challenge the existing laws, there were many challenges for the teaching of evolution in public schools. This famous court case, known as the Scopes Monkey Trial in Dayton, Tennessee, held in 1925, urged the state law prohibiting the teaching of evolution. John Scopes, a substitute teacher, at the request of the ACLU, was teaching biology from an evolutionary perspective. The ACLU had to be a test case with the subject and worked with the school district and scopes. Scopes lost the case and was sentenced to a fine, and the anti-evolution Butler Act was confirmed.

Nevertheless, it is a well accepted maxim that you can “win the battle and lose the war.” It seemed like the end result of this famous case. The case was covered extensively by the media. Continue on behalf of the state was known fundamentalist and three times the former presidential candidate, William Jennings Bryan. In defense of the liberal defenders of good Scopes, Clarence Darrow was known. Although Darrow lost the case, in the opinion of most Americans, emerged looking rather foolish and fanatical fundamentalists. Time has passed. Finally, science has prevailed, and prevailed in the development of public school biology classes. Read the rest of this entry »