Intelligent Design

As featured in the documentary (available in DVD format) found “— Expelled No Intelligence Allowed,” evolutionists are extremely difficult to achieve in relation to any other thoughts on the subject. (If they had direct access to Darwin himself, they would have surely prevented even to reverse his own views – which did, by the way, he does.) What is frightening to discuss options? Is it not the process of researching a topic of disagreement, the first order of educational programs and scientific research (in particular) are expected to do, why not students, teachers, professors, university and allowed freedom to explore different opinions why the hierarchy of the evolution of religion, they apparently can not accept any control of their dogmas? should feel condemned, just as these people do not think we need to burn strong-arm tactics to denounce? Of course we should! Read the rest of this entry »

There is a harsh reality for those who (in addition to reject the immensity of the mysteries of the physical universe), the concept of a Creator, or “intelligent designer” for the realization of the enormity and complexity of life on Earth – rejected the simple childlike theology. This atheist dogma asserts that our fantasy world, sparked into life simply by lightning a chemical pool “soup” inorganic, the creation of a single cell life (never achieved despite decades of efforts Laboratory), which has then developed only by Darwin’s evolutionary -random mutation. The harsh reality is a negative imperative, how can an intelligent, rational mind to understand the incredible complexity and perfection of the DNA double helix, the foundation of all life and creature-variety on display – not adore thee point (figuratively) in the humble acceptance of the superiority of intelligence as a unique, creative manifests itself in such a depth (yet conceptually simple) coding block and the blueprint for all life forms – while recognizing that such perfection was not by chance, still occur due to human intelligence? May decline to an exceptionally intelligent leadership not be a denial of their own reasoning power – on the decision of Pure Reason, bigoted, anti-God doctrine. (In reality, there is apparently no middle Faith!) Read the rest of this entry »

“Intelligent Design” – perhaps in no area of ​​intellectual activity among the many outstanding achievements of mankind – in search of knowledge and imagination and creativity, as well as a rationalization, discriminating judgment was so clear that in the field of aviation and space technology – from The opening half-century after the Wright brothers’ heavier than air “flight powered by the concept of survival of the company’s competitive (as with all living beings in the history of the earth – in competition for survival functions) has developed the implementation of the optimization. – the effectiveness of performance or cost – for any type of aircraft and space vehicles, through the full range of vehicles: military superiority (for fighters, it means the second place death) to a tripling of the B-70 supersonic bomber, the giant commercial subsonic aircraft, Concorde Mach 2, to reach for small private planes to exploratory activities spacecraft to the moon, and the space shuttle to reach the space station). These pioneers of aviation and space vehicle developed by specialized intelligent of all facets, and the factor- function are involved in the engineering process, optimized for each type and size of the vehicle – just like the “natural” (in any way the use of “intelligent design” function) used the common basic functions, optimized for the spectra of living things: Life in line blood vessels and gear oil, arteries to the capillaries and veins that pump heart with its valves and chambers, lungs, legs, arms, caressing, fingers, eyes, ears, genitalia with elements evocative and sensory function of the dual system of waste disposal, etc. Each function is specialized for the unique size of the creature and Necessity (completely disagree with Darwinism – the proclamation of the “theory” supposedly easy on random mutations causally-based). Read the rest of this entry »